The spectre of “spectre” has spawned a haunting image of America.
“… Photography is a myth.”
There is a museum exhibit in Peter Manseau’s “The apparitions.” The core content of this book is the Boston (later) in New York photographer William muller (William Mumler) trial, he was accused of cheating people, claimed that he can take photos “spirit” – the portrait including spectrum which is closely linked with the life theme. But no one is photographing ghosts in a vacuum. Outside the trial Manseau went from room to room to see how the United States got there.
Given the path of civil war, telegrams, PT barnum, spiritualism and well-trained seals, it is impressive that ghost scholars are as light as books. The tone is profound, but the touch is light; The technique is an ingenious explanation of who has been too long to reintroduce briefly, and manso is happy to reassure you that you are reading history. (among the two warring photographers, he noted, unfortunately, “human cooperation is often temporary.” )
Of course, as with any useful history, humor has its own unique air. We are reading a new religion, so that many americans are worried that this is a kind of the dead, but we are reading about new technology suddenly overturned the way people think about communication, to subvert the way people think about life and death war, and unprecedented thing – newspapers, travel, “objective” picture portrait – turn the way people think about the real. (was called to the booth to prove his authenticity, barnum had forecast kristol announced a capitalism: “the money they paid for them, they have their own choice.” The past has made its whirlpool strange and outdated, but it always brings us back to the present.
In this way, the apparitions are as many mirrors as possible as snapshots – and Manseau is acutely aware of this. Entangled with the center of a handful of historical figures are colorful, Mumler seems to be the most unforgivable thing, is against media can forgive him, for photography studio are intertwined in the newspaper, and Barnum, is excusable. But Manseau is also serious about changing the ocean around him. Especially after the civil war, the suffering in the United States, and how the mass media shaped the narrative. (Matthew brady’s photo team searches the battlefield for “the kind of picture that brady was after: an isolated moment that reflects the whole nation.”)
Manso has found a delicate balance between the elimination of history and the immediacy of suspense, and manages to maintain – perhaps necessary – agnosticism when it is important.
There is also a fine line between science and faith. Rhetoric thinks, the modern rhetoric criminal classification standard is only slightly backward; Religious minorities, such as the Catholic church, are trying to legitimize themselves in a time when science demands a constant reassessment of the potentially unholy. The rise of idealism, especially the development of photography) is alternately as waste as nonsense, and is regarded as a kind of religion, the religion for those treasured you never really had to leave – after the civil war, more and more from the suspect’s position in this country so irreversible.
Manseau easily weaves all these things together, which is remarkable, because the story behind it tells us to go to Mumler’s fraud trial. But when we once again return to the court, there is also a fear, and with the participants realize that this is not about a consumer fraud case, it is a case about beliefs limit. Manso has found a delicate balance between the elimination of history and the immediacy of suspense, and manages to maintain – perhaps necessary – agnosticism when it is important. Because like the original shunt (and tell) a history, the wraith is a biography of why we believe.